Rationality and institutions : an inquiry into the normative implications of rational choice theory.

I aim to analyze in this dissertation what a desirable basic institutional structure looks like from the perspective of rationality. While the main topic is thus normative in nature, I start by clarifying in the first part what the notion of rationality exactly entails. I do so by focusing explicitly on the economic conception of rationality, according to which a rational individual is motivated to serve his self-interest on the basis of cost-benefit calculations. Such a Homo Economicus is characterized by his intentional and instrumental actions, his perfectly informed beliefs and his exogenously given and egoistic preferences. In my view, however, this model is inadequate if one aims to understand what it means to be rational. The requirements that actions should be instrumental, beliefs should be based on perfect information and preferences should be exogenously given and egoistic in nature turn out to be overly demanding in this respect. That is why I propose to drop these assumptions in what I label the minimal conception of rationality. Since the latter turns out to be very formal indeed, I propose two further alternatives, which focus not so much on the choice of means to achieve certain goals, as they focus on the choice of these goals themselves. According to the first, broad conception, actions are rational if they are based on good reasons, which are further qualified as well-informed beliefs and autonomous preferences. According to the second, expressive conception, actions, beliefs and preferences are rational if they express the things the individual at hand cares about. The latter requires that individuals can reflect upon and identify with their reasons, which implies a capacity to reflect upon and distance themselves from their own bundle of preferences. In the second part of this dissertation, I try to show the value and limitations of these conceptions by applying them to the context of large-scaled elections. In this respect, it becomes immediately clear that the economic conception fails to explain why quite a lot of people go out and vote. After all, since a single vote has only an infinitesimal impact on the electoral result, it does not enable people to serve their interests or realize their goals. This leads to the so-called voting paradox, according to which no rational individual will decide to vote. The standard solution is to assume that individuals vote because they derive satisfaction from the very act itself. However, this strategy is rather ‘ad hoc’ and does not explain how people vote once they find themselves inside the voting booth. The expressive conception of rationality does better in this respect. It suggests that people vote because they care about democracy in general or about a specific political candidate or ideology. Since they conceive of themselves as being a good citizen (or a good socialist), they express this aspect of their identity by going out to vote (for the socialist party). In the third part of this dissertation, I analyze more fully the normative implications of the different conceptions of rationality. More specifically, I try to answer the question which basic institutional structure is desirable if one assumes that people are by and large rational. This immediately shows that both the normative issue (what should institutions look like) and the explanatory issue (how do rational individuals act) are closely connected. In my view, proposals regarding institutional design and reform should be based on empirically adequate models of individual actions and motivations. This search for a realistic utopia goes against the conventional strategy of most economists. They rely on the Homo Economicus model, even if this fails to explain individual behavior. To explain more fully what the normative implications are of the counterfactual assumption that all people are economically rational, I focus on the work of James Buchanan. In his theory of constitutional choice, he argues in favor of a minimal state whose only task is to make sure that the market functions properly. Buchanan thus favors strict constitutional limitations for governments, which tend to expand beyond legitimate borders as soon as politicians and public servants are allowed to serve their own interests. In my view, however, the abovementioned criticisms of the Homo Economicus model have theoretical as well as normative implications. After all, the empirically supported fact that a majority of individuals does not act in economically rational ways creates more room for legitimate government intervention. Expressively rational citizens will, for example, more easily agree on the necessity and desirability of a collective provision of certain public goods. In addition, expressively rational politicians and public servants can be more easily trusted to serve the public interest rather than their narrowly defined self-interest. As an alternative to Buchanan’s one-sided focus on economic rationality (at the individual level) and the market (at the institutional level), I focus on the work of Samuel Bowles en Herbert Gintis. More specifically, I explore their work on the phenomenon of strong reciprocity, which refers to the widespread tendency of people to reward prosocial behavior and punish antisocial behavior, even if this is costly for themselves. Since this is clearly economically irrational, Bowles and Gintis propose to complement the Homo Economicus model with the Homo Reciprocans model. This model, which comes close to the expressive conception of rationality, is able to incorporate the insight that social norms surrounding reciprocity, cooperation and fairness are crucial in regulating interactions. At the normative level, Bowles and Gintis stress that such norms often lead to socially desirable outcomes, since they enable people to live in harmony without relying on coercive and costly government interventions. This suggests that the debate between proponents of the market on the one hand and the state on the other hand neglects the importance of communities where people spontaneously interact on the basis of generally prosocial norms. As such, the insights of Bowles and Gintis lead to a defense of a basic institutional structure in which markets, states and communities mutually complement and reinforce each other. They also justify a general optimism as regards to the capacity and motivation of people to try and improve the rules and institutions that govern their everyday lives.rationality; institutions; public choice theory; rational choice theory; paradox of voting;

Tough on Tolerance:The Vice of Virtue

It is commonly accepted that tolerance is a virtue, a desirable character trait that should be fostered and cultivated, especially in liberal societies. In this chapter, we consider the plausibility of an alternative view, namely that tolerance is not necessarily a virtue. This view adopts a broad and normatively neutral definition of tolerance as simply meaning: deliberately refraining from intervening with conduct one finds objectionable. Moreover, if tolerance is to play an important role in the kind of liberal and pluralist democracies we are currently living in, then such a broad and neutral conception is much more suitable than a more narrow and normatively laden one. Tolerance can and should be something enforceable through law, which becomes difficult, if not impossible, when one understands it as a virtue

The ethics of nudging:An overview

So-called nudge policies utilize insights from behavioral science to achieve policy outcomes. Nudge policies try to improve people's decisions by changing the ways options are presented to them, rather than changing the options themselves or incentivizing or coercing people. Nudging has been met with great enthusiasm but also fierce criticism. This paper provides an overview of the debate on the ethics of nudging to date. After outlining arguments in favor of nudging, we first discuss different objections that all revolve around the worry that nudging vitiates personal autonomy. We split up this worry into different dimensions of autonomy, such as freedom of choice, volitional autonomy, rational agency, and freedom as nondomination. We next discuss worries that nudging is manipulative, violates human dignity, and prevents more important structural reform. Throughout, we will present responses that proponents of nudging can muster. On the whole, we conclude that the objections fail to establish that the nudge program as a whole should be rejected. At the same time, they give us important guidance when moving towards an ethical assessment of nudges on a case-by-case basis. Towards the end, we provide some possible ways forward in debates around the ethics of nudging

Boosting Healthier Choices

Thomas Rouyard and colleagues discuss use of the boosting approach as an alternative to nudging in developing non-coercive interventions to promote health

Design of a robotic system for battery dismantling from tablets

Due to the rapid increase in sales of mobile electronic devices, the number of batteries ending up in waste electric and electronic equipment (WEEE) is also rapidly increasing. According to the EU legislation, all batteries need to be removed from WEEE, which is currently done manually for tablets, posing potential safety risks for workers and resulting in high processing costs due to the labour intensity of the required dismantling operations. Therefore, a robotic dismantling system is developed in this research to automatically remove both the back covers and batteries from a mixed waste stream of tablets of different models and brands. At the outset of the design process, a total of 47 randomly collected tablets were analyzed to define the location of the battery and the required manual dismantling time. Thereafter, a robotic bending method was tested for removing the back cover. Once the battery is exposed, two different methods are tested: using a heat gun to loosen the glue that fixes the battery to the rest of the tablet and a robotic scraping method with a spatula to mechanically extract the battery. Whereas the required time for only the heating showed to be more than 120s, the results with the bending and scraping tool show that the proposed robotic dismantling system is capable of removing the back cover and battery for 63% of the tested tablets in less than 90s. However, to increase the economic viability and robustness of the proposed method to be able to cope with the high variety in tablet model designs, future work is required to develop algorithms to recognize product models to enable to define and retrieve product specific toolpaths for dismantling.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

Inferring transcriptional modules from ChIP-chip, motif and microarray data

'ReMoDiscovery' is an intuitive algorithm to correlate regulatory programs with regulators and corresponding motifs to a set of co-expressed genes. It exploits in a concurrent way three independent data sources: ChIP-chip data, motif information and gene expression profiles. When compared to published module discovery algorithms, ReMoDiscovery is fast and easily tunable. We evaluated our method on yeast data, where it was shown to generate biologically meaningful findings and allowed the prediction of potential novel roles of transcriptional regulators

Assessing the efficiency of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) based sorting of post-consumer aluminium scrap

The aluminium Twitch fraction of a Belgian recycling facility could be further sorted by implementing Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS). To achieve this goal, the presented research identifies commercially interesting output fractions and investigates machine learning methods to classify the post-consumer aluminium scrap samples based on the spectral data collected by the LIBS sensor for 834 aluminium scrap pieces. The classification performance is assessed with X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) reference measurements of the investigated aluminium samples, and expressed in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and f1 score. Finally, the influence of misclassifications on the composition of the desired output fractions is evaluated.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

Techno-economic assessment of robotic sorting of aluminium scrap

Due to shifting material use in several sectors, such as the automotive sector, the demand for wrought aluminium alloys is significantly increasing. Because of their low weight and desirable mechanical properties, wrought aluminium alloys find their use in many different applications. However, the primary production of aluminium is extremely energy intensive. Therefore, using secondary aluminium yields major environmental benefits. Hence, in order to avoid degradation of the aluminium quality during recycling, sorting aluminium alloys, based on their alloying elements, is necessary. Today, various non-ferrous metal fractions are either still sorted manually in unhealthy working conditions, resulting in either high labour costs, or the export of this waste stream to countries with a lower labour cost. With the emergence of novel spectrometric techniques, such as laser-induced breakdown spectrometry (LIBS) and deep learning computer vision techniques, the technical feasibility of classifying different aluminium alloys has been demonstrated. Therefore, the techno-economic viability of a robotic sorting process, that could be combined with such advanced classification systems, is presented. This study presents the development and evaluation of a robotic sorting system consisting of; a vision system, a conveyor, a SCARA robot and a pneumatic gripper. The vision system recognises the dimensions and positions of the objects on the conveyor and communicates with an innovative sequence planning algorithm. The use of experimental data enables to obtain realistic insights in the sorting efficiencies that can be obtained. The initial economic analysis illustrates the substantial potential of the proposed robotic sorting approach. To overcome saturation of the conveyor belt, two of the proposed systems are assumed to be capable of sorting 20.000 tons of aluminium annually each equipped with 6 robots creating a total added revenue up to 1,95 million euro per year.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

Multivariate landscape analysis of honey bee winter mortality in Wallonia, Belgium

The European honey bee species (Apis mellifera L.) is under increasing pressure from anthropogenic and other stressors. Winter mortality of entire colonies is generally attributed to biological, environmental, and management conditions. The rates of winter mortality can vary extremely from place to place. A landscape approach is used here to examine the dependency between spatially distributed winter mortality rates, environmental and biological conditions, and apiary management. The analysis was applied to data for the region of Wallonia in Belgium with winter mortality rates obtained from the European project EPILOBEE. Potential explanatory variables were spatially allocated based on GIS analysis, and subjected to binomial linear regression to identify the most predominant variables related to bee winter mortality. The results point to infestation with Varroa, the number of frost days, the potential flying hours, the connectivity of the natural landscape, and the use of plant protection products as most dominant causes for the region of Wallonia. The outcomes of this study will help focus beekeeping and environmental management to improve bee health and the effectiveness of apiary practices. The approach surpasses application to the problem of bee mortality and could be used to compare and rank the causes of other environmental problems by their significance, particularly when these are interdependent and spatially differentiated